<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Howie Chong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://howiechong.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://howiechong.com</link>
	<description>redesigning the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How Fossil Fuels are Subsidized (infographic) by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2010/07/how-fossil-fuels-are-subsidized-infographic/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=667#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to know what the subsidy is in per-kWh terms, for fossil fuel vs. for renewables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to know what the subsidy is in per-kWh terms, for fossil fuel vs. for renewables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post-Copenhagen Part 2:  The Goods by klem</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2010/03/post-copenhagen-part-2-the-goods/comment-page-1/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>klem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=527#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>The canyon which must be crossed is that the paying countries don&#039;t want to pay and the receiving countries know that the money is not free . Both sides feel that the costs are just too high. Neither side wants to sign this treaty.

The paying countries don&#039;t want to be involved with controlling the spending of the money in the developing countries. In other words they don&#039;t want to control those countries. So they don&#039;t want to sign.

Also the countries receiving the money just want the money, they don&#039;t want to be told how to spend it. The money has alot of string attached to it, and giving up sovereignty is a cost that is just too high. So they don&#039;t want to sign. This treaty is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The canyon which must be crossed is that the paying countries don&#8217;t want to pay and the receiving countries know that the money is not free . Both sides feel that the costs are just too high. Neither side wants to sign this treaty.</p>
<p>The paying countries don&#8217;t want to be involved with controlling the spending of the money in the developing countries. In other words they don&#8217;t want to control those countries. So they don&#8217;t want to sign.</p>
<p>Also the countries receiving the money just want the money, they don&#8217;t want to be told how to spend it. The money has alot of string attached to it, and giving up sovereignty is a cost that is just too high. So they don&#8217;t want to sign. This treaty is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five Reasons to Follow the Copenhagen Climate Talks by Joseph Pallant</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/12/five-reasons-to-follow-the-copenhagen-climate-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Pallant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=399#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>Howie,

That&#039;s the most easy-to-connect-with synopsis on why to follow Copenhagen I&#039;ve seen. Thanks!

I guess I&#039;ll go!

Joseph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howie,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the most easy-to-connect-with synopsis on why to follow Copenhagen I&#8217;ve seen. Thanks!</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll go!</p>
<p>Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frustration over climate is beginning to boil by Five Reasons to Follow the Copenhagen Climate Talks &#124; Howie Chong</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/10/frustration-over-the-climate-is-beginning-to-boil/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Reasons to Follow the Copenhagen Climate Talks &#124; Howie Chong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=357#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>[...] Naomi Klein, expect this to be the sequel to the 1999 Seattle protests.  I&#8217;ve previously blogged about the frustration being felt by youth groups.  Additionally there are indigenous groups [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Naomi Klein, expect this to be the sequel to the 1999 Seattle protests.  I&#8217;ve previously blogged about the frustration being felt by youth groups.  Additionally there are indigenous groups [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple discloses carbon footprint details by Twitted by RheaJohnson</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/09/apple-carbon-footprint/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by RheaJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=346#comment-960</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by RheaJohnson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by RheaJohnson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple discloses carbon footprint details by Twitted by carbonzero</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/09/apple-carbon-footprint/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by carbonzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=346#comment-959</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by carbonzero [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by carbonzero [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple discloses carbon footprint details by Twitted by howiechong</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/09/apple-carbon-footprint/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by howiechong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=346#comment-957</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by howiechong [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by howiechong [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Details of US Climate Bill by Howie</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/04/climate-bill-hearings-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=218#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliment.  It&#039;s much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliment.  It&#8217;s much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Details of US Climate Bill by Josh Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/04/climate-bill-hearings-in-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=218#comment-670</guid>
		<description>I discovered your homepage by coincidence.
Very interesting posts and well written.
I will put your site on my blogroll.
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered your homepage by coincidence.<br />
Very interesting posts and well written.<br />
I will put your site on my blogroll.<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US, Canada closer to Cap-and-Trade Market by Matt West</title>
		<link>http://howiechong.com/2009/04/us-canada-closer-to-cap-and-trade-market/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howiechong.com/?p=153#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Cap-and-trade may not have the support it needs at present, but I believe the US climate change bill will pass into law because putting a price on carbon affords flexibility and serves as a powerful funding tool to support the Presidents over-arching strategy. However, I am not optimistic about a cap-and-trade deal from a Harper government. I welcome your thoughts.

http://thegreenmarket.blogspot.com/2009/04/cap-and-trade-what-and-why.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cap-and-trade may not have the support it needs at present, but I believe the US climate change bill will pass into law because putting a price on carbon affords flexibility and serves as a powerful funding tool to support the Presidents over-arching strategy. However, I am not optimistic about a cap-and-trade deal from a Harper government. I welcome your thoughts.</p>
<p><a href="http://thegreenmarket.blogspot.com/2009/04/cap-and-trade-what-and-why.html" rel="nofollow">http://thegreenmarket.blogspot.com/2009/04/cap-and-trade-what-and-why.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
